Growing with the fishes

Bio-integrated aquaponics is predicted to boom.

December 4, 2014

In Malcolm Gladwell’s book, The Tipping Point, Gladwell describes how an idea can reach a “moment of critical mass,” where the stars seem to align and a certain idea, or product, is embraced by the larger populace. This appears to be the case with aquaponics, a form of agriculture that effectively combines fish culture with hydroponics.

“I think we’re going to start seeing commercial aquaponics explode,” says Meg Stout, chairman of the Aquaponics Association and author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Aquaponic Gardening.

Aquaponics is a “bio-integrated” system that combines aquaculture and hydroponics symbiotically, so that one literally feeds off the other, in a self-sustaining fashion. In this system, fish, vegetables, flowers, and/or herbs can be grown for market under the protection of a greenhouse covering.

Aquaculture meets hydroponics

Hydroponics involves growing plants in a soilless medium, such as perlite, rockwool, gravel, and more recently, coconut coir. (See “Hydroponicsfor a changing market,” page 14.) Plants are fed via a liquid nutrient delivery system and grown by different hydroponic systems or methods based on a grower’s situation and preference, including the nutrient film technique (NFT), floating rafts, and noncirculating water culture. A thorough understanding of the pros and cons of these systems is important before starting up an aquaponics growing operation.

Aquaculture, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is the rearing of fish, shellfish, and some aquatic plants to supplement the natural supply. Fish are reared in controlled conditions and though many government agencies practice aquaculture to stock lakes and rivers for sport fishing, most aquaculture supplies the commercial food market. It also supplies goldfish and other decorative fish for home aquariums and bait fish for sport and commercial fishing. The plants that are most adaptable to this model of farming are lettuce, specialty greens (spinach, chives, basil, and watercress), and herbs. Plants that yield fruit (tomatoes, bell peppers, and cucumbers) are grown in larger, well-stocked aquaculture systems that generate the higher nutrient volume needed for production.

There are several fish species, both cold and warm water, adapted to an aquaponic system, including trout, perch, tilapia, Arctic char, and bass. Tilapia appears to be one of the better adapted fish species for these recirculating systems.

Combining aquaculture with hydroponics gives farmers the potential to grow a highly marketable crop of fish, vegetables, and herbs that can be sold at farmer’s markets and local retail outlets.

Sustainable system of growing gains recognition

Aquaponics will always be a niche market, says Donald Bailey, research specialist at the University of the Virgin Islands, and won’t replace the need for the acres upon acres of food production we see in the Midwest and California. However, it is a sustainable system that recognizes a global need to recover and reuse water and waste products.

The aquaponics model is a mutually beneficial system for aquaculture and hydroponic systems. The fish tanks produce nutrient-rich effluent that is used to fertilize hydroponic production beds in vegetable producing houses. The nutrients generated from the fish manure, algae, and decomposing fish feed are contaminants that would otherwise become toxic in the fish tanks; instead, they will become liquid fertilizer for the hydroponically grown plants.

We’re not done yet. The water going into the hydroponic beds is being filtered by the plants, removing ammonia, nitrates, nitrites, and phosphorous. The filtered water can then be pumped, or otherwise recirculated, back into the fish tanks in a win-win situation whereas fresh, nutritious food is produced in both systems and made available to consumers, which ultimately benefits the local economy.

It’s these factors—a combination of a strong local food movement that relies heavily on organic food production, the need to conserve water, especially in arid regions, and a change in food safety laws—that have brought aquaponics to a tipping point.

“Aquaponics significantly reduces the amount of water used to both farm fish and raise plants without soil (e.g., hydroponics),” says Stout. “As hydroponics already uses as much as 90 percent less than conventional soil farming, it is often stated that aquaponics can reduce water consumption associated with food production by as much as 90 to 95 percent.”

She adds the benefit of a more defined food safety policy: “Now that the CanadaGAPTM audit can be used to obtain Food Safety certification for aquaponics, existing aquaculture operations can reasonably add an aquaponics element to reduce water consumption and produce a cash crop from their waste stream,” says Stout. “We're already seeing aquaculture businesses overseas move in this direction.” (The CanadaGAPTM is a food safety certification program for companies that produce, pack and store fruits and vegetables.)

Not for the novice

Although backyard systems for fish and plant production, (i.e., aquaponics) have been popular among home gardeners and fish enthusiasts for years, commercial aquaponics is not for the novice. There is a fairly steep learning curve because you’re not only combining two systems – fish production and hydroponics – each which require extensive training, you also need a bit of business acumen.

“We'd first recommend professional training with an industry leader, which will run about $2,000 (course, travel, and housing) for a one week course,” says Stout. “This should give the farmer a solid basis for adapting a basic system to their unique situation.”

Of course, there is also the expense to get up and running. Like any basic business model, it is essential that you explore your markets before you invest in tanks, houses, and various equipment. Stout says you’re looking at somewhere in the neighborhood of $50,000 to get started.

“I would budget $50,000 for facilities and refine that estimate with current quotes for greenhouse facilities, tanks, filters, grow beds, floating rafts, aeration, and installation of water and electricity,” says Stout.

To learn more about what is needed to get started, Stout, an engineer with experience in hydrodynamics and a background in product development, suggests taking a look at the Southern Regional Aquaculture Center (SRAC) publication on aquaponics (SRAC 454). "There's no need to re-invent the wheel when the federally funded USDA Aquaculture Centers have identified a good working model," she adds.

Stout adds a few words of warning for those considering jumping into aquaponics: “The two major issues we've seen are 1) people starting with a large facility before they had established their market, and running out of credit before they became profitable and 2) people jumping in without investing in training, resulting in sub-optimal and even dangerous designs.”

With design in mind, let’s look at two aquaponic systems that have been popular over the last 30 years of trial and error.

The University of the Virgin Islands (UVI) System

The beautiful Virgin Islands with delightful ocean breezes may be good for tourists, but the island itself doesn’t have the room to support much agriculture, at least not in the way we might think of in California or Iowa. Thus, several years ago, James Rakocy, Ph.D, and associates at UVI, started experimenting with aquaponics as a way to produce food in small spaces. Today, UVI is the leader of commercial-scale aquaponics technology.

Now under the tutelage Donald Bailey, UVI has developed the Deep Water Channel (DWC) system because of the operational complexity of the aggregate system they were using previously, and the ability to scale the DWC system to very large sizes, according to Bailey.

With this self-containing system they raise tilapia in the tanks and use a floating raft system to grow basil, lettuce, okra, and other crops, reporting “outstanding yields.”

The Speraneo system

Tom and Paula Speraneo, owners of S&S Aqua Farm near West Plains, Mo., popularized this method, which became a model for dozens of commercial aquaponic greenhouses and high school biology programs.

Their commercial solar greenhouse is 50 x 80 feet and contains six 1,200 gallon fish tanks. Each tank is linked to a one foot deep hydroponic bed filled with river gravel. They raise tilapia in the fish tanks and grow basil, tomatoes, cucumbers, mixed salad greens, and an assortment of vegetables, herbs and even bedding plants.

The Speraneos borrowed some of the research experience and expertise from that done at North Carolina State University. The Speraneo system, started in the 90s, is now used worldwide to grow plants and fish for market. A resource packet can be ordered that further explains how this system is set up and operated (see below).

Of the working models that have come to prominence over the past few years, the UVI model has probably been the most documented and is mentioned in SRAC 454. Stout says copying this model is important in securing funding for an aquaponics operation.

“Moving beyond the UVI model, we are seeing a number of small farms that integrate media beds between the fish tanks and DWC grow beds to both support large crops (e.g., papaya trees and banana trees) and help filter the water,” says Stout. “Other farmers are looking at decoupled aquaponics, where the aquaculture component and the hydroponic component can be isolated, if necessary, without harming the other portion of the system. Decoupled aquaponic systems would be most attractive to someone who already had an existing hydroponic or aquaculture facility.”

Do your homework

Whatever setup you choose, be sure to learn as much as you can about aquaponics and have a comprehensive business plan in place before you get started.

“It is very important to be educated and trained in aquaponic system operation,” says Bailey. “There are many aquaponic systems in the “bone yard” of homes and businesses.”

Neil Moran is a horticulturist and freelance writer based in Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.

For more:

SRAC 454: https://srac.tamu.edu/index.cfm/getFactSheet/whichfactsheet/105/
Resource packet for the Speraneo system: S & S Aqua Farm, 417-256-5124
The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Aquaponic Gardening (2013), Meg Stout
Aquaponic Gardening A Step-by-step Guide to Raising Vegetables and Fish Together (2011), Silvia Bernstein
Alternative Farming Systems Information Center: https://afsic.nal.usda.gov/aquaculture-and-soilless-farming/aquaponics

USDA releases 2012 Census of Agriculture data

U.S. producers reported record sales and production expenses in 2012. The numbers show steady growth for greenhouse vegetable and herb production.

December 3, 2014

Industry News

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has released the 2012 Census of Agriculture.

The numbers paint an interesting portrait of agriculture in America. There are now 914.5 million acres of farmland, 2.1 million farms, and 3.2 million farmers. Twenty-two percent of all farmers were "beginning farmers" in 2012, meaning they had operated a farm for 10 years or less.

Production expenses have never been higher for growers, but neither have sales. Growers recorded record numbers in both categories, selling $394.6 billion worth of agricultural products, but paying a cost of $328.9 billion to produce those products.

For greenhouse growers of crops, the numbers were mostly promising. Greenhouse mushroom production appears to have increased in terms of number of farmers, but not in terms of square footage:

2007 recorded 462 farms, producing with 45,308,740 square feet;
2012 rose to 712 farms, producing with 37,416,059 square feet.

But mushroom sales increased across the market (indoor and outdoor production):

2007---$985,295,349;
2012---$1,071,500,006.

Greenhouse tomatoes saw steady growth between 2007 and 2012:

2007 recorded 2,926 farms with square footage of 43,949,871. Their reported value of sales was $393,783,610;
2012 reported 6,323 farms with square footage of 55,180,582. Their reported value of sales was $400,286,262.

The census also reported a somewhat amorphous category called "other greenhouse vegetables and herbs." The numbers are similarly promising:

2007 recorded 2,032 farms with 17,816,064 square feet of production;
2012 recorded 5,268 farms, with 42,819,149 square feet of production;
Sales: 2007 had 2,015 report sales, totalling $159,251,078;
2012 reported sales totalling $234,199,741.

The final tally for greenhouse vegetables and fresh cut herbs broke down like this:

2007 reported 4,075 farms with sq. footage of 61,765,935 and a total value of sales of $553,034,688;
2012 reported 8,750 farms with sq. footage of 97,999,731 and a total value of sales of $634,486,003.

All of the greenhouse related statistics are available at this link.

Other stats of note from the report: 70 percent of farms now have Internet access, up from 56.5 percent in 2007. About 150,000 farmers, nationwide, are selling their products directly to consumers. About 57,300 farms reported using a renewable energy source in 2012, up from 23,451 in 2007. Sixty-three percent of farms said they were using solar panels. Thirty percent of farm operators are now women.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack released a statement on the results:"The Census results reiterate the continued need for policies that help grow the rural economy from the middle out. The data illustrate the power of USDA efforts to grow the economy and strengthen infrastructure in rural America, create new market opportunities for farmers and ranchers, and provide access to capital, credit, and disaster assistance for producers of all sizes. The Census also shows the potential for continued growth in the bioeconomy, organics, and local and regional food systems. USDA will continue to focus on innovative, creative policies that give farmers, ranchers, and entrepreneurs the tools they need to attract a bright and diverse body of talent to rural America."

The preliminary results from the study were released Feb. 20, 2014 and showed the value of agriculture products in the U.S. had risen to rising to $394.6 billion in 2012, up $97.4 billion from 2007. However, the number of farms and farm land decreased slightly over the same five-year span.

Why California's drought-stressed fruit may be better for you

Preliminary research suggests the dryness isn't hurting the produce's nutritional value, and may even boost it.

December 2, 2014

NPR

Industry News

California's severe drought is putting stress on everyone these days: the residents whose wells are running dry; the farmers forced to experiment with growing their produce with much less water; and of course, the thirsty fruits and vegetables themselves.

But preliminary research suggests the dryness isn't hurting the produce's nutritional value, and with a few added minerals may even boost it.

That's the tantalizing concept Tiziana Centofanti has been studying at the U.S. Department of Agriculture lab in Parlier, Calif., a sprawling campus of experimental farmland about half an hour south of Fresno.

Centofanti is a research scientist affiliated with the Center for Irrigation Technology at Fresno State. One of the questions she's asking is how fruit trees react to drought, compared to fruit from trees that get plenty of water.

"My research is about physiological response to stresses," Centofanti says, "and drought is one of those."

Some of the pomegranate trees in the orchards at Parlier are pretty stressed out. They're planted inside a tile ring that constrains their root systems, forcing them to burrow deep into the ground. Centofanti waters them with a solution of salt, boron and selenium; these are natural elements in the soil on many Central Valley farms that are also struggling with drought.

"You will definitely see that these trees are much, much smaller," she says. They're actually dwarfish, and the fruit on them is tiny, too.

Centofanti shows me another plot of pomegranates she's watering with just 35 percent of what a tree normally would drink, and yet another group of trees that are getting half the normal amount of water. These trees all are growing to the usual height but their fruit is cracked, so you can see the pomegranate seeds peeking out like tiny rubies.

Research shows that pomegranates have specific compounds that may reduce swelling and infection, even possibly fight DNA damage and cardiovascular disease. So to see how drought might change that fruit chemistry, Centofanti takes the water-stressed pomegranates into the lab, cuts them and uses a French press to squeeze everything, including the peel, into juice. She shakes that onto a magnetic stirrer, and analyzes it with liquid chromatography.

Click here to read more.